I'm not really speaking of how things are legally right now, just that I think the law should be different. If non-hurtcore CP was legal and adult-child sex and relationships or what I meant by "loving lolis" was also legal, the trauma of police involvement in this matter would probably not have happened. Depending on whether or not you meant the girl was being "molested" in the sense of actually molested (undesired contact) or merely having sexual play with the step-father in some capacity (which he would not come forward about of course in this current legal status quo.) Assuming actual molestation and undesired contact, or put simply - rape - that falls under "harming lolis" and that's when police should get involved and cart the fucker off to be tried and punished if found to have done so - much like any other rapist. And if the whole thing was in the mother's head or she was just trying to fuck him over for custody, then she is also abusing that child for her own gain and is a piece of shit.
As for this video description >>41667
I mean you could say it's perverted, but I would disagree if you mean perverted because of the sexual contact itself, the perverted part to me is the fact the girl was asleep in the video mentioned. But I don't know what the woman and girl's relationship or familiarity with one another was like outside of that text snippet. It could be that they had none, it could be that they had regular mutually enjoyable sexual play. If it was the former I'd say it would be wrong to film and essentially rape, if it's the latter I would say it is fine bar the legal issues that would arise in the current status quo of pedophilia being illegal to practice and CP being likewise illegal.
Not sexually loving them.
Sex is fun and little girls enjoy being pleasured whether society will admit it to itself or not. Rapists still rape, prohibiting child love only prohibits positive relationships because rapists will just kill her to cover their tracks.